US top court rules Puerto Rico not entitled to welfare programme | Courts News

Supreme Court docket justices say denying advantages to residents of Puerto Rico doesn’t violate their constitutional rights.

The USA Supreme Court docket has dominated that individuals residing within the US territory of Puerto Rico are usually not entitled to the identical federal welfare advantages supplied to residents residing within the nation’s 50 states.

In an eight-to-one determination on Thursday, the highest courtroom dominated towards a Puerto Rico resident who argued that not receiving advantages allotted to low-income aged and disabled Individuals – referred to as Supplemental Safety Earnings (SSI) – violated his constitutional proper to equal safety underneath the regulation.

The justices argued that the US Structure offers Congress broad authority over federal taxation and advantages in Puerto Rico, noting that residents of the Caribbean island don’t pay federal earnings tax.

Puerto Rico residents are US residents, however they haven’t any illustration in Congress and can’t vote in US common elections.

“The Structure affords Congress substantial discretion over learn how to construction federal tax and advantages packages for residents of the Territories,” conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote within the majority opinion.

He added that Congress could determine to increase SSI advantages to Puerto Rico. “However the restricted query earlier than this Court docket is whether or not, underneath the Structure, Congress should lengthen Supplemental Safety Earnings to residents of Puerto Rico to the identical extent as to residents of the States. The reply is not any,” he wrote.

The decrease courts had sided with Jose Luis Vaello Madero, the disabled Puerto Rico resident concerned within the case, who had moved to the island from New York however continued to obtain SSI advantages.

When the authorities found that he was getting help they deemed he was not eligible for, they sued him for a sum of $28,000.

On Thursday, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the only dissenting voice – whose dad and mom had been from Puerto Rico –  rejected the bulk’s give attention to taxation, stressing that the SSI programme goals to make sure assist to the poorest Individuals.

“SSI is designed to help the neediest residents. As a program of final resort, it’s aimed toward stopping essentially the most extreme poverty. In view of that core goal, denying advantages to a whole bunch of hundreds of eligible Puerto Rico residents as a result of they don’t pay sufficient in taxes is completely irrational,” she wrote in a dissenting opinion.

“Congress’ determination to disclaim to the US residents of Puerto Rico a social security web that it offers to virtually all different US residents is particularly merciless given these residents’ dire want for assist.”

A former Spanish colony, the island was acquired by the US in 1898 after the Spanish-American conflict. With greater than three million individuals, it’s the most populous of the US territories which can be topic to totally different remedy than the nation’s 50 states.

“Sufficient of this colonial standing that discriminates towards us and impacts our high quality of life. The one and the most effective resolution is statehood,” Pedro Pierluisi, Puerto Rico’s governor, mentioned in a press release.

The federal government’s enchantment of the decrease courtroom’s determination within the SSI case had began underneath the administration of former President Donald Trump.

The administration of present US President Joe Biden pressed on with the case, however Biden’s social spending agenda, which has come to a halt in Congress, would have prolonged SSI advantages to Puerto Rico.

Leave a Reply